Blog
JANUARY 22, 2026 • 5 MIN READ

Fiona Jelly,
Founder & CEO of Complyfirst

This applies to PIs/EMIs and Banks in the EU & the UK
The OECD Common Reporting Standard is the global framework for the automatic exchange of financial account information between tax authorities. Banks and investment firms have reported under it for years.
CRS 2.0 is the OECD's first full review of that standard, and it pulls products that used to sit outside the net firmly inside it.
Under the original CRS framework, many e-money products sat outside scope because CRS was written for traditional bank accounts, not digital wallets. It focused on deposits and custodial accounts used for saving or investment, whereas e-money products are typically prepaid wallets, safeguarded rather than deposited, and used for payments.
CRS 2.0 closes that gap. It explicitly brings certain e-money and account-like digital products in, treats the holding of value and payment functionality as a potential trigger, and expects bank-grade due diligence and evidence behind every reportable account. Many EMIs are now Reporting Financial Institutions for the first time.
The standard has not been rebuilt from scratch. The obligations are familiar to anyone who owned the reporting obligation at a bank. What has changed is the perimeter and the detail. More products in scope, more granular data per account, stronger checks linking tax self-certifications to KYC, and an updated XML schema for the reports themselves.
TL;DR
Here is how CRS, CARF, and DAC8 all relate.
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| CRS (Common Reporting Standard) | The OECD’s global standard for the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts. CRS applies to banks, investment firms, and now certain e-money and digital products. It sets the due-diligence and reporting requirements firms must follow. |
| CRS 2.0 (the CRS amendments) | Updates issued by the OECD that expand CRS scope, increase data granularity, strengthen due-diligence expectations, and update reporting schemas. These amendments are what change obligations for e-money institutions from 1 January 2026. |
| CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) | A separate OECD reporting framework for crypto-asset transactions. CARF applies to crypto firms and does not apply to traditional financial accounts or e-money products. |
| DAC8 | EU legislation that implements two OECD standards into EU law: CARF for crypto-asset reporting, and the amended CRS rules for financial accounts and certain digital money products. DAC8 is the EU legal mechanism through which these standards apply. |
This is where the work lands. CRS 2.0 raises the bar across onboarding, data quality and reporting. For many e-money institutions it means running CRS controls in practice for the first time. These are the grenades, the specific things to watch for.
| CRS 2.0 change | What it means in practice |
|---|---|
| E-money and account-like digital products are now in scope | Certain e-money wallets and digital value products must be treated as reportable financial accounts. Many EMIs are required to apply CRS controls for the first time. |
| All tax residences must be captured and reported | Record every country where a customer is tax resident and report all declared tax residences, not just a single primary one. Ensure onboarding flows and systems support multiple tax residencies per customer. |
| More detailed customer information is required | Capture structured tax data at onboarding and obtain a valid tax self-certificate confirming tax residence. Collect a Tax Identification Number (TIN) for each declared tax residence, or record a valid reason where unavailable, and keep customer tax information current. |
| Stronger checks on customer information | Assess whether tax self-certifications and declared tax residences are consistent with KYC data, then investigate and resolve any inconsistencies. Retain evidence showing checks and reviews were performed. |
| Ongoing monitoring is required | Monitor customers for changes in circumstances that may affect tax residence and refresh self-certifications and tax data when changes are identified. Treat CRS as a continuous obligation rather than a one-off exercise. |
| Updated CRS XML schema | Prepare annual reports using the updated OECD CRS XML schema and map internal data accurately to reporting fields. Be ready to correct rejected or incomplete files. |
| Closer regulatory scrutiny | Expect closer review of onboarding, data quality, and evidence, and anticipate follow-up questions from tax authorities. Address gaps early to reduce audit and penalty risk. |
CRS 2.0 applies to all Reporting Financial Institutions in the UK and EU, including e-money institutions now brought in for the first time. The standard underneath is identical. The legal route differs by region, and so do the exact deadlines.
The UK applies CRS 2.0 through HMRC's International Tax Compliance regulations, updated for 2025. The dates a UK compliance lead needs on the wall:
So 2026 is the data year. 2027 is the reporting year. Everything you file in 2027 rests on the data you are capturing right now.
The EU applies CRS 2.0 and CARF through DAC8, Council Directive (EU) 2023/2226. Member states had to transpose it into national law by 31 December 2025, and the rules apply from 1 January 2026. First exchanges are due in 2027, within nine months of the first reporting year ending. Most member states land on 30 September 2027, though some sit earlier at 30 June. Check the date in each jurisdiction you hold a licence in. We cover the crypto side in our DAC8 and crypto-asset reporting guide.
CRS obligations bite from the moment they apply. There is no grace period and no soft launch.
In the UK, legislation provides for financial penalties where CRS obligations are not met, including:
In the EU, penalties are set by individual Member States but must be effective, proportionate, and dissuasive. This often means penalties in the hundreds or thousands of euros, depending on the nature and scale of the issue.
For EMIs, the risk is scale. Where the same issue affects large customer populations or persists across reporting cycles, the consequences can extend well beyond an isolated fine. In more serious cases, firms may face:
These risks are not theoretical. HMRC have been clear that data collected under CRS 2 and CARF will be used to identify non-compliance and pursue enforcement action where necessary. Firms that delay preparation risk underestimating both the scale and complexity of the new requirements.
Complyfirst supports firms in implementing CRS 2.0 as a compliant, repeatable process, aligned with regulatory expectations.
For a full snapshot of CRS2, you can watch the video snippet below from Fiona’s EU webinar session, or download a full PDF snapshot right here.
For many e-money institutions, the amended CRS rules mark a step change in how tax reporting obligations apply in practice.
From January 2026, CRS compliance must be embedded into onboarding, customer data management, and ongoing monitoring. Firms that integrate CRS controls into their day-to-day processes will be better prepared for reporting, regulatory review, and follow-up. Firms that delay risk identifying gaps only once reporting requirements are live, when remediation is more complex and costly.