Blog
MAY 4, 2026 • 7 MIN READ

Fiona Jelly,
Founder & CEO of Complyfirst
This applies to PIs/EMIs in the UK
From 7 May 2026, every UK payment institution and e-money institution that safeguards customer funds has a new monthly return to submit: REP027. It’s the first monthly regulatory return UK PIs and EMIs have ever had to file, and the first deadline is already 21 July 2026.
The FCA XML schema has finally been published. It’s what unlocks API-based submission and makes a repeatable monthly process actually achievable.
This guide will everything your team needs to know. What REP027 is, why it exists, who’s in scope, what you need to report section by section, and how to build a process that doesn’t fall apart by month three.
Let’s get into it!
TL;DR
REP027 is a standalone monthly safeguarding return submitted to the FCA via RegData. It’s the first ever monthly regulatory return for UK payment institutions and e-money institutions.
It sits in the FCA Handbook at SUP 16.14A and Annex 29BR, introduced by FCA 2025/38, and runs alongside the new safeguarding rules in CASS 15.
The whole point of the return is to give the FCA proper visibility on how firms safeguard customer funds every month, not just a once-a-year snapshot. Annual reporting hasn’t been catching the problems that build up between periods. Monthly reporting closes that gap.
REP027 covers:
Before REP027, safeguarding data was tucked inside broader returns like FSA056 and FIN060a. This is a completely different beast. Far more granular, standalone, and closer to a CASS-style return than anything UK PIs and EMIs have had to submit before.
REP027 is part of PS25/12, the FCA’s overhaul of the safeguarding regime. Arguably the biggest reform since the PSRs and EMRs came in.
Here’s why it got to this point:
That regime hasn’t held up. Three of the most prominent failures:
| Firm | Year | What happened |
|---|---|---|
| Premier FX | 2018 | Failed to properly safeguard customer funds |
| Ipagoo | 2019 | Went into administration having failed to safeguard |
| Applied Wallet | 2019 | Went into liquidation for the same reason |
Each case dragged on for years. Customers recovered only a fraction of what they were owed.
And these firms aren’t outliers. Across 12 payment firm insolvencies between 2018 and 2023:
The FCA is closing the gap. And REP027 is a huge part of that.
REP027 is one of six areas PS25/12 tightens. Here is the before and after:
| Area | Before | After (PS25/12 ) |
|---|---|---|
| Reconciliations | Required under the PSRs and EMRs but no prescriptive cadence | One per reconciliation day (excludes weekends, bank holidays, foreign market closures), comparing safeguarding requirement vs resource. Any shortfall fixed immediately |
| Separate reconciliations for e-money vs payment services | Single safeguarding view across activities | E-money funds and payment services funds reconciled and safeguarded separately, so each pool is transparent in an insolvency |
| Resolution packs | No formal requirement to maintain a single, live resolution pack | Live document covering safeguarding accounts, custodians, agents, distributors, return-of-funds procedures, and safeguarding contracts |
| Annual safeguarding audits | In practice, only larger firms in scope | Almost all firms in scope (firms with under ÂŁ100k safeguarded over the past 53 weeks are exempt) |
| Third-party oversight | Third-party oversight High-level expectations | Detailed due diligence on banks, custodians, and insurers; documented diversification decisions; liquidity stress tests confirming 24-hour redemption capability; insurance and guarantee renewal decisions taken three months before expiry |
| FCA reporting | Safeguarding data buried inside broader returns (FSA056, FIN060a) | Standalone monthly return (REP027) submitted via RegData |
That last row is REP027. It’s what we’re going to be diving into in this blog.
REP027 applies to all safeguarding institutions holding relevant funds under the PSRs or EMRs:
If you are an SPI or SEMI that has not opted in, REP027 does not apply. If you have opted in, even voluntarily, you are in scope.
Firms providing unrelated payment services (UPS) must also complete Sections 10 to 17. That roughly doubles the length of the return.
| Milestones | Date |
|---|---|
| Go-live | 7 May 2026 |
| First return due | 21 July 2026 |
| Reporting frequency | Monthly |
| Submission deadline | 15 business days after month-end |
The 15 business day window is where compliance teams will feel the pressure. It overlaps directly with month-end close, and the data sits across finance, ops, and compliance in different systems.
REP027 goes via the FCA’s RegData platform, within 15 business days of month-end. You’ve got two ways to do it:
Option 1: Manual entry
Option 2: API or XML submission
Now that the schema’s been published, option 2 is really the no-brainer. It’s the one worth building toward.

What truly sets Complyfirst apart is its ability to simulate a regulator’s review, identifying potential data discrepancies or inconsistencies across multiple reports before submission.
Pamela Crilly, EU COO, TrueLayer
Not every firm fills in every section. Getting this wrong means either over-reporting or missing sections you should have completed.
| Sections | Who completes them |
|---|---|
| Sections 1, 2 and 9 | Every firm in scope |
| Sections 3 to 8 | Only if you were required to safeguard during the period |
| Sections 10 to 17 | Only firms providing unrelated payment services (EMIs providing UPS, SEMIs that opted in, credit unions that opted in) |
If your business model includes unrelated payment services, the return roughly doubles in length.
Sections 1 to 9 are the core return:
| Section | What you report |
|---|---|
| Section 1: Firm and category | Firm name, category of safeguarding institution, details of your most recent safeguarding audit |
| Section 2: Safeguarding method | Method(s) used during the period (segregation, insurance, guarantee, or a mix), method at the time of your last internal reconciliation, number of clients safeguarded, whether you used any non-standard internal reconciliation procedure |
| Section 3: Balances | Highest and lowest safeguarding requirement during the period, in sterling |
| Section 4: Where funds are held | See breakdown below |
| Section 5: Resource vs requirement | What you actually safeguarded across bank accounts, segregated funds not yet placed, relevant assets, and insurance or guarantee cover, compared to what you were required to safeguard. Any excess or shortfall at month-end, and what you did to fix it |
| Section 6: D+1 segregation check | D+1 resource vs D+1 requirement from your last internal reconciliation, plus any adjustments made |
| Section 7: Reconciliations | Yes/no: did you carry out internal and external reconciliations on every reconciliation day? |
| Section 8: Record-keeping | Accounts at start of month, opened, closed, accounts at month-end, plus acknowledgment letter status for each. If letters are missing, you explain why |
| Section 9: Notifiable CASS breaches | Anything you were required to notify the FCA about: material errors in records, failed reconciliations, unresolved discrepancies, material shortfalls between requirement and resource, insurance or guarantee cover nearing expiry (the FCA expects three months’ notice), or any other CASS 15 breach |
Section 4 in detail: Where funds are held
This one varies depending on how you safeguard:
For firms providing unrelated payment services, Sections 10 to 17 repeat the same checks for that activity.
This is the first ever monthly regulatory return for UK PIs and EMIs. Here is where this is going to bite:
The firms that find the first deadline straightforward will be the ones building a repeatable monthly process now, not the week before it’s due.
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Work out your scope | Are you required to safeguard? Did you opt in? Do sections 10 to 17 apply to your business model? |
| Map your data sources | Work out where each REP027 data point currently lives. Section 4 and Section 8 tend to be the most fragmented |
| Build a repeatable extract | You’ll be doing this every month. A canned extract is the baseline. XML or API submission removes the manual re-keying entirely |
| Set up maker/checker | Build an approval workflow so every return gets reviewed before submission and there’s a record of how each figure was derived |
| Get the dates in the diary | 15 business days after month-end, every month. First deadline: 21 July 2026 |
| Think ahead to your annual audit | The monthly trail you build from day one feeds directly into your annual safeguarding audit. Get it right early and it does double duty |
The firms that’ll find the first deadline manageable are the ones treating this as an automation problem now, not a reporting problem in June.
The FCA’s published XSD schema is what makes that possible. It defines exactly what a valid REP027 submission looks like. With it, you can build a canned extract from your existing systems that maps directly to the return and submits to RegData automatically. Set it up once. Run it every month.
| Approach | What it involves | Sustainable long-term? |
|---|---|---|
| Manual | Pull data from systems, key into RegData | Honestly? No. The data is fragmented, the window is tight, and this is monthly |
| API / XML | Build a canned extract using the FCA’s XSD schema, submit via RegData API | Yes. The setup takes time upfront, but then it just runs |
Complyfirst is built specifically for UK PIs and EMIs getting ready for REP027. We’re the home of safeguarding reporting.
We sit in the middle of the monthly process so you don’t have to piece it together manually every time:
Get in touch to talk through your setup. And DM us if you’d like our Excel template to start mapping your data today, even if you’re not working with us.